Pro-Life
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
April 21, 2007
A belated congraulations to the Supreme Court of the United States. Thank-you for saying that Partial Birth Abortions are not unconstitutional. What about any abortions is "constitutional? I didn't see any mention of that word there the last time that I read it.
* * * * * * * * * * *
Feb 20, 2007
Bad news for the Pro-choice group. The recent news about a baby in Florida, who was only in the womb for 22 weeks, is living. So much for the argument that a fetus is "only a non-viable tissue mass." Medical science is continuing to refute that common myth, and now we have living proof - outside of the womb.
With the grace of God, this child will continue to live, and we all pray that she will grow into a healthy young person.
* * * * * * * * * * *
February 2007
After we seemed to have put a rest to the Stem Cell question, for the time being, then with the National elections coming up, it's reared it's ugly head again. However, this time there is a new wrinkle in the mix. They have reported that there are usable Stem Cells in amniotic fluid, and in the placenta. So why do we have to kill unborn children?
* * * * * * * * * * *
So...two more women have died from using RU 486. And why are we not surprised that Planned Parenthood (rather Planning from Parenthood) administered the drug in a method that wasn't approved by the FDA.
Pro-Life groups are again pushing for the recall of this drug.
* * * * * * * * * * *
Tenessee is attempting to join South Dakota. There is another state that is jumping on the bandwagon, as well, but I can't remember which one it is at the moment. It is good to see.
* * * * * * * * * * *
I'm glad to see that South Dakota has put a legal end to the abortion debate. Now, we have to wait and see what the Supreme Court will decide after NARAL, NOW, and other "women's" and abortion rights groups sue the state, and declare their new laws "unconstitutional".
The last time that I read the Constitution, I didn't see anything in there about a women's right to have an abortion.
If you get down to brass tacks, the "pro-choice" crowd isn't about "choice". Have you ever noticed how they get down right irate and hysterical if a woman decides to keep her baby, or to carry her baby to term (especially if the baby has a known negative diagnosis), and give it up for adoption?
Its not about choice. Its about having unrestricted sex without the consequences of raising the child that the sex act produces.
The time for choice is before you get pregnant. They jump up and cry,"But what about rape???" but the fact is, very few women get pregnant as a result of rape in comparison to the number that get pregnant from carelessness and immoral behavior.
* * * * * * * * * * *
So what's so wrong about getting parental notification for a teen-aged girl to get an abortion? An abortion is a surgical procedure, right? Doesn't a hospital need to get parental signatures for any other surgical procedures?